Template:Did you know nominations/Hiram Bledsoe's Missouri Battery

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Hiram Bledsoe's Missouri Battery

Moved to mainspace by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 02:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC).

  • Date and length fine. I am going to approve ALT2 AGF on the book source as I think it is the most interesting of the two as civilian casualties and chain shot aren't that original. However @Hog Farm: I would prepare for a rough ride if this gets promoted as it is likely people might find the wording controversial (Possibly a good job you left off them being Confederates too, I'm approving it as it's hooky and in context and I stand by WP:NOTCENSORED). QPQ is done with no close paraphrasing. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I definitely think it should actually include the fact that it was a cannon. To a lesser extent I think it should also be added that it was a Confederate unit. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • @Peacemaker67 and The C of E: - If that's the case, I'd propose a new hook instead. Stating that an artillery battery had a cannon is fairly obvious, and the name of the cannon basically becomes gratuitous profanity at that point. How about Hog Farm Bacon 14:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)