Template:Did you know nominations/Heather Dewey-Hagborg
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 14:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Heather Dewey-Hagborg edit
... that bio-hackers such as Heather Dewey-Hagborg (artwork pictured) can collect discarded hair, gum or cigarette butts, sequence the DNA and turn it into a 3-D sculpture?
- ALT1:
... that bio-hackers such as Heather Dewey-Hagborg (artwork pictured) can collect discarded hair, gum or cigarette butts, sequence the DNA and turn it into 3-D art?
- ALT1:
5x expanded by SojoQ (talk). Self nominated at 11:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC).
This is the most fascinating article I've ever read on Wikipedia! 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well-referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook refs verified and cited inline. No QPQ necessary for first-time nominator. My only question is why you're referring to the subject as one of a group of bio-hackers. Wikipedia does not have any article on bio-hacking, to my knowledge. Why not just say:- ALT2:
... that information artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg collects discarded hair, gum, and cigarette butts, sequences the DNA, and turns it into a 3-D sculpture (pictured)?Yoninah (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC) - Heather Dewey-Hagborg self-identifies as a "bio-hacker" but "information artist" can work just as well. Thoughts? SojoQ (talk) 23:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- So would you prefer:
- ALT3: ... that bio-hacker Heather Dewey-Hagborg collects discarded hair, gum, and cigarette butts, sequences the DNA, and turns it into a 3-D sculpture (pictured)? Yoninah (talk) 23:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- I wonder which will draw people into the article more? Information artist might be "friendlier" and "bio-hacker" more provocative.SojoQ (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Let's be provocative. I just found the Biohacking article, so I'll link that. Since I just tightened the wording in the hook, I'm going ahead and approving it. ALT3 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
