Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Diddlebock

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 04:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Harry Diddlebock edit

5x expanded by EricEnfermero (talk). Self-nominated at 02:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article has been expanded from 235 chars to 2996 chars since 01:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC), a 12.75-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2996 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely (7.4% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  • This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited to a reliable source, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)