Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Anthony

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Harry Anthony edit

Created by 78.26 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Meets all five criteria for DYK. Let 'er rip! LavaBaron (talk) 01:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Please list review details, as a courtesy to the nominator, especially if meant to be used as a QPQ. Please don't leave room for this being pulled from promotion because of inadequate review. — Maile (talk) 20:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Meets all DYK criteria. Good to go! LavaBaron (talk) 08:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Again, please do a proper review. sst 07:35, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
  • As per administrator ruling here, it's been determined no further review is needed. This is cleared for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 04:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  • There was no such administrator ruling or determination; reinstating sst's request for a proper review, or a new reviewer could do a review instead. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  • A discussion in DYK Talk has failed consensus that the review is unacceptable; I don't want to engage in vote-counting but, to make things concise, I'll note 4 editors have proferred the belief it is acceptable, 4 have objected, and 2 have unclear opinions. For lack of a consensus to overturn the review, it is clear for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 15:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)