Template:Did you know nominations/Glyptotherium

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Theleekycauldron (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Glyptotherium

Glyptotherium skeleton
Glyptotherium skeleton

Improved to Good Article status by Augustios Paleo (talk) and PrimalMustelid (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 20:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Glyptotherium; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • New enough, long enough. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done and image properly licensed. ALT0 and ALT1 both require specialist knowledge to understand - what else have you got?--Launchballer 10:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
    • I think ALT1 has the seeds of something interesting in it (something like "Most X are herbivores but subset Y eat something different" isn't that technical in my opinion). However, some clarification is needed - the Pampatheriidae article says they "are thought to have been primarily grazers", but that isn't quite what the Glyptotherium article says. Augustios Paleo and PrimalMustelid, as the GA noms, can you clarify? ♠PMC(talk) 06:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
withdraw. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)