Template:Did you know nominations/Gilbert-Sinton Historic District
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Gilbert-Sinton Historic District edit
- ... that the Gilbert-Sinton neighborhood grew rapidly along Cincinnati's first streetcar line?
Expanded 7.5x by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 22:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- I forgot to say — I reviewed 7 Independent Company (Rhodesia). Nyttend (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Article long enough, 5x expansion recent enough, well-cited, the hook is cited (online ref). AGF for the offline source. My only question is whether or not the first ref should be in the infobox. I read the other day that they're not supposed to have them and I know they generally don't. Having it there makes the first ref read as 2, rather than 1. I just struck me; I don't know if it's an issue or not. Marrante (talk) 08:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- That's the standard for {{Infobox NRHP}}, since it's the source for some information that's quite relevant but doesn't exactly belong in the text, such as the coordinates and the governing body. It's used that way in some GAs, such as Mummy Cave or Immaculate Conception Catholic Church (Celina, Ohio). Nyttend (talk) 06:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
