Template:Did you know nominations/Gendo Ikari

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Gendo Ikari

Improved to Good Article status by TeenAngels1234 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC).

Dunno. I hope so, but, unfortunately, I'm not into DYNs. I ping @Bleff: and @Amakuru: for this.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
  • my hook (ALT1) still looks okay to me, but we'll need a reviewer for the DYK criteria. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 03:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
    @Theleekycauldron: my only query would be whether it's correct to use the word "diagnose" here. Obviously Gendo Ikari is a fictional character, so it's not a case of the Goldwater rule (which we'd almost certainly have to avoid entirely if this were a BLP). And this is an interesting fact, but I think diagnose has a somewhat strict medical definition which maybe we should avoid here. Just a thought anyway. I'll be happy to sign off if we can agree on something with regard to that.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
    @Amakuru: how's "identified"? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 16:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
    @Theleekycauldron: - OK, so something like:
    ALT1a: ... that Neon Genesis Evangelion character Gendo Ikari has been identified as having narcissistic personality disorder by a real-life Japanese psychiatrist?
    I'd be happy with that. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
    Thanks! all right, hook's hammered out, but the article still needs a completed review. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 19:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Article was a newly-promoted GA at the time of the nomination, and all of the GA criteria check out. ALT1a's fact is cited inline and verified; my Japanese isn't good enough to confirm the information (though I can tell that it does mention his name) so I am assuming good faith for the content. The only issue is that a QPQ is needed as the nominator already has five DYK credits. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
  • @TeenAngels1234: Hello, a QPQ is still needed for the nomination to pass. The nomination may failed if a QPQ is not provided within a week. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Okay, then. I'm busy with university, but I'm gonna make a quid pro quo review anyway.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Per DYK guidelines, one will need to be provided within one week of a reminder, so one needs to be accomplished by April 2nd. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
I see, @Narutolovehinata5:. As I said I'm not practical and I'm busy, but thank you again for your patience. I tried with this nomination anyway.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)