- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Football Leaks edit
- ... that the website Football Leaks reveals transfer fee, wage and contract information about famous footballers?
- Reviewed: 58th Ariel Awards
Created by Joseph2302 and SLBedit (talk). Self-nominated at 19:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC).
- Comment I've unlinked "footballers" as that page is about all types of football, not just association football, so linking to it is not really helpful. Edwardx (talk) 12:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've correct the link, so it's now to Association football, as the term "football" is ambiguous. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Article is new and long enough with 1,686 chars at nomination time. It cites sources inline, and is neutral. Ref #4 says "was estimated at around €60m" for the phrase in the article "rather than €60 million as had been reported". For my POV it is misleading. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports only 0–2% copyvio rates. Hook is well-formated and interesting. Its length is within limit. Hook's fact is cited inline. QPQ was done. I will approve after the above mentioned issue is resolved. CeeGee 14:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- CeeGee Changed it to "rather than around €60 million as had been estimated." Joseph2302 (talk) 17:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Everything is fine now. Good to go. CeeGee 03:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
