Template:Did you know nominations/Epistola consolatoria ad pergentes in bellum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Epistola consolatoria ad pergentes in bellum
- ... that the Epistola consolatoria ad pergentes in bellum, a Carolingian military sermon, promises soldiers victory as long as they don't engage in sexual activity or looting? Source: Bachrach, David S. (2003). Religion and the Conduct of War, c. 300–1215
- ALT1: ... that a Carolingian military sermon promises soldiers victory, provided they don't engage in sexual activity or looting? Source: Bachrach, David S. (2003). Religion and the Conduct of War, c. 300–1215
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Theodore Silverstein
- Comment: The restrictions ofc only apply during their "working hours", and not when the soldiers are back home. I mean, looting was probably still shunned, but not sexual activity. Don't know if that needs more explanation in the hook, or if it's obvious enough and only "hooky". Also not sure if more or less wikilinks would be better.
Created by Srnec (talk). Nominated by LordPeterII (talk) at 18:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC).
Hi LordPeterII, interesting article. Review follows: article created 4 September and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources; I can't access most of the sources so will AGF on paraphrasing from them (Earwig finds nothing of concern online); hooks are interesting (I don't think further clarification is needed) and mentioned in the article; hook fact is cited, AGF that the source backs up the claim; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 12:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
