Template:Did you know nominations/Enchylium conglomeratum

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Enchylium conglomeratum

(

)

... that Enchylium conglomeratum's global conservation status of "Secure" (G5) stands in stark contrast to its designation as "Extinct" in the UK and "Regionally Extinct" in Switzerland? Source: NatureServe, British Lichen Society, . Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
- ALT1: ... that while lichen species Enchylium conglomeratum is considered "Secure" globally, it has been designated as "Extinct" in the UK and "Regionally Extinct" in Switzerland? Source: NatureServe, British Lichen Society, . Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
- ALT2: ... that lichen species Enchylium conglomeratum's global Conservation status of "Secure" (G5) stands in stark contrast to its designation as "Extinct" in the UK and "Regionally Extinct" in Switzerland? Source: NatureServe, British Lichen Society, . Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Feel free to share your alt hook. Also, I'd like to know your thoughts on a pictured DYK of this.

Created by Xkalponik (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

X (talk) 21:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC).

Reviewing mainly the DYK-specific criteria since this is GA... ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 10:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

E. conglomeratum

(picture and then good to go) Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral, copyvio-free (Earwig returns trivial things, such as synonyms or WP:LIMITED descriptions), copyedited some style and grammar. Hook is cited, interesting, with my preference on ALT1's conciseness, no QPQ required. @Xkalponik: As for the image, both the lead and 2010 images are fine, the bark one does not focus well on the lichen to me. The lead image has more details from far away, while the 2010 sample has more interesting details when zoomed in. I suppose I'll let you decide. ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 11:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good to go with ALT1 and File:Collema conglomeratum con.jpg. ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 13:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)