Template:Did you know nominations/Eliane Capobianco
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk) 03:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Eliane Capobianco
_Chamber_of_Deputies_of_Bolivia.jpg)
Capobianco Sandoval in 2017
... that Eliane Capobianco's 2019 return as regional director of the National Institute of Agrarian Reform occurred nearly two decades after she first held the post in 2002?Source: UNITEL
Improved to Good Article status by Krisgabwoosh (talk). Self-nominated at 16:51, 12 August 2022 (UTC).
This article is long enough and was promoted to GA status within the past 7 days. Earwig check did not find any copyright issues. In general, the article is within policy as far as it pertains to DYK eligibility. QPQ is done. However, I cannot approve the hook. It is cited, but it is not interesting to a broad audience. An alternative hook is needed to satisfy this criterion. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Valid. I had my own doubts as well. However, I opted to put it up anyway in hopes of possibly workshopping a good alt. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 20:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- There may be something interesting that can be said about her work with food insecurity, just from a brief read of the article. In particular, her statement that GMOs are necessary to keep Bolivian producers competitive. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- That could work. Her links to the country's agribusiness sector could also be used. Perhaps something like:
- ALT1: ... that Eliane Capobianco's election to the Bolivian Constituent Assembly reflected the propensity of the country's agribusiness elites to occupy positions that granted them influence over land reform policy?
I think that's better. It's not earthshattering but I think it's much better at satisfying interesting to a broad audience than the original hook was. I'm willing to approve ALT1. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
