- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Electoral history of the Labour Party (UK)
Improved to Good Article status by Michaeldble (talk). Self-nominated at 17:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Electoral history of the Labour Party (UK); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
No previous DYK noms. Passed GA recently. Copyvio check passes. Quick question though about the hook, "earned fewer votes" doesn't feel like the typical language used. I would have expected the phrase "received fewer votes". Not a dealbreaker in anyway, it just catches me off guard and wanted to flag it. Might be worthwhile sticking an alt here with it and allow the promoter to pick their preferred. Seddon talk 10:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Michaeldble: Please respond to the above. Z1720 (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: @Seddon: Yes, that sounds more natural to me as well, I've just changed it now. Michaeldble (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Seddon, are you going to continue this review, or should I call for a new reviewer? Z1720, are you interested if Seddon isn't? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
New reviewer needed; prior reviewer has not returned despite activity elsewhere. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Amended hook checks out as do all criteria. Let's roll.--Launchballer 23:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No previous DYK noms. Passed GA recently. Copyvio check passes. Quick question though about the hook, "earned fewer votes" doesn't feel like the typical language used. I would have expected the phrase "received fewer votes". Not a dealbreaker in anyway, it just catches me off guard and wanted to flag it. Might be worthwhile sticking an alt here with it and allow the promoter to pick their preferred. Seddon talk 10:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
