Template:Did you know nominations/Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kimikel talk 01:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences
- ... that a screen based on the circuitry of a rat brain (pictured) is displayed at the façade of the Jerusalem-based Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences?
- Source: Overlaid with gleaming 21st-century filigree, this esthetic delight hints at pattern and order, embedded in randomness. “They are Henry Markram’s neurons – or rather, from his rat brains,” explains Segev, “and we at ELSC had the idea of this neuron trellis wrapping round the building.” https://www.jpost.com/Jerusalem-Report/In-sickness-and-in-health-540756
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I am trying to find a better image to illustrate the neuron screen
Created by Simxaraba (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Simxaraba (talk) 07:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC).
- I have now added what I think is a better image of the neuron screen. I can come up with another hook if this one is not good enough.Simxaraba (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- The article is new enough, long enough, has size and references are fine, and the hook works well. QPQ isn't required. I think the other picture in the article might show the facade with the neural network detail more clearly, so it could be a better fit. Anyway, we're all set! Mariamnei (talk) 10:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Kindly add a media marker—i.e., (pictured)— in the approved hook so that it may be promoted along with your preferred image. Speaking of which, do you agree with the reviewer's suggestion? If so, consider including it in this page. Thanks, Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Since the nominator has been inactive for two weeks now, I'm just gonna go ahead and boldly do these myself. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)