Template:Did you know nominations/Dorothea Pertz

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 03:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Dorothea Pertz edit

Moved to mainspace by BethNaught (talk). Self nominated at 14:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Review Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely (article moved from author's user space to main space and nominated same day) and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report :The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. I did not have access to the Browne book, but WP:AGF. The Ogilvie book google book url maxed out after I read the article, but it supports the hook too. WP:QPQ confirmed. I prefer the original hook to ALT 1. 7&6=thirteen () 16:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)