Template:Did you know nominations/Door Tree

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Door Tree

Door Tree in 1898
Door Tree in 1898

Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 22:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC).

  • Hi Bruxton, review follows: article created 9 February and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources for the subject matter; I didn't find any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hooks are interesting, mentioned in the article and check out to sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Image is appropriate but I don't see any back-up for its pre-1927 publication on the Commons page? - Dumelow (talk) 07:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
  • @Dumelow: I see the issue about the missing pre 1927 publication of the photo. The photo is 124 years old so I will need to look further into the original publication - It was published recently without a copyright and the original photographer was H.B. Welch pictured in the photo on the left. The other photo in the article is only slightly less interesting but was published in a book in 1943, it is a 1936 PD photo. Perhaps we just swap the photos and I can tag the one in question with G7 until I find the end of the rainbow or find a more appropriate license? Let me know what you think. Thanks for the review! Bruxton (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bruxton, that's fine by me. I know it always frustrates me in similar circumstances where an image is almost certainly PD, but the proof is not readily to hand! - Dumelow (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
  • @Dumelow: I went back to the photo that is clearer and the one which will probably have more interest. Bruxton (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Bruxton. To confirm, I think the licensing of this photo has now been proven satisfactorily - Dumelow (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

ALT0 to T:DYK/P1