Template:Did you know nominations/Dontnod Entertainment

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Dontnod Entertainment edit

  • ... that the video game developer Dontnod Entertainment aims to reinvent itself with every title it releases?

Improved to Good Article status by Cognissonance (talk). Self-nominated at 13:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC).

  • It is unclear what "reinvent itself" means. Does it mean swapping out all the employees? Making a game in a new genre? It sounds like generic marketing pablum. I think something about their switch from action games would be better. Like "... that the video game developer Dontnod Entertainment gained wide success in narrative games after their action game flopped?"
Article is also a self nom and therefore requires a QPQ.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:39, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Zxcvbnm: I chose a more specific version of your suggested angle. How is it? Reviewing a DYK now. Cognissonance (talk) 10:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Cognissonance:I don't think it's interesting to a wide audience, as required of DYK. "This company got richer" is something that people would expect of a company after a successful release. I still think something about their pivot from an action game to narrative games is the most DYK-worthy.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Zxcvbnm: Wrote a new hook to suit a wider audience. Cognissonance (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Cognissonance: Seems good to me now, ready for DYK. Though I'd personally use "sold poorly" rather than "proved to be a failure" as I think the latter is more harsh term.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)