- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Diademed amazon
edit
Diademed amazon
- ... that the diademed amazon is considered "endangered" because the forests in Brazil in which it lives are being felled for soybean production and cattle ranching? Source: " The primary threat to this species is accelerating deforestation in the Amazon Basin as land is cleared for cattle ranching and soy production"
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Greetings! I'm not skilled with reviewing animal articles, but I gave this one a shot. I normally give comprehensive reviews, but here it's not needed. I think that all that needs to be changed is one letter of one word that's in the article twice. Basically, the species name for the red-lored amazon seems to be "autumnalis", not "autumnalia". When two characters are all you really need to tinker with, that's a pretty good sign. Otherwise, as far as I could tell, the book entry seems to check out (it's somewhat hard for me to read it, mind you, but I thought I saw everything in the book that's in the article), as does the IUCN site. I don't have the BirdLife reference, but I accept it in good faith. From what I can tell, this is another quality article from you. This is an easy checkmark once the very, very, very, very minor fixes are done. JustJamie820 (talk) 05:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- @JustJamie820: Thank you for the review and comments. I have changed the specific epithet of the red-lored amazon, which was indeed incorrect, but looking back in the article's history, I see that the error had been in the stub article since its creation three years ago. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth:: Hello again. Go figure that the error had persisted. Anyway, that was all that was necessary to fix. That means it's
time. Great work.
.jpg)
Greetings! I'm not skilled with reviewing animal articles, but I gave this one a shot. I normally give comprehensive reviews, but here it's not needed. I think that all that needs to be changed is one letter of one word that's in the article twice. Basically, the species name for the red-lored amazon seems to be "autumnalis", not "autumnalia". When two characters are all you really need to tinker with, that's a pretty good sign. Otherwise, as far as I could tell, the book entry seems to check out (it's somewhat hard for me to read it, mind you, but I thought I saw everything in the book that's in the article), as does the IUCN site. I don't have the BirdLife reference, but I accept it in good faith. From what I can tell, this is another quality article from you. This is an easy checkmark once the very, very, very, very minor fixes are done. JustJamie820 (talk) 05:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
