Template:Did you know nominations/Der Busant

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: by Allen3 talk 10:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Der Busant edit

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk), Drmies (talk), De728631 (talk), LadyofShalott (Talk), and Johnbod (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 00:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC).

  • Length, date verified. Hook's offline ref accepted AGF. All refs appear to be RS. No apparent copyvio detected. QPQ done. Interesting hook (I prefer it over the ALT); its length is fine. GTG. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you. And that reference is no longer offline. Actually there should always have been a "preview" option for that Google book. De728631 (talk) 23:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  • I usually remove the extraneous stuff at the back to keep the URL simple. The book is still accessible using the "search inside this book" function. Anyways, thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Hook verified! GTG. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't mind that wording. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Der Busant has been dated to the early 14th century. It's not clear at all from Meyer & Mooyer whether the 13th-century copy of Freidank's work in their source includes the Bussant. De728631 (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT3 is also fine by me. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)