Template:Did you know nominations/Cybergeddon (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cybergeddon (film) edit
... that the 2012 web series Cybergeddon cost three times as much as any previous web series?
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 06:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 05:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1638 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (3.8% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• 
Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 85 characters
- ✗ TonyTheTiger has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 07:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Sula megapode (1st of 4 QPQs).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
With QPQ concluded, everything else is good to go. Hook is cited as "three times" if you're looking for it. Maury Markowitz (talk) 23:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
I think this hook will not do. The source supporting the hook compares the cost of Cybergeddon to that of Electric City, but does not state that that was previously the most expensive web series. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it does. It specifically states that. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please point me to the sentence where this is specifically stated. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- "At $6 million, Cybergeddon is the most expensive Web series of all time, topping the roughly $2 million spent on Tom Hanks’ Electric City." essentially states that Electric City was the prior record holder.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw that before. It may imply but does not state that Electric City was the prior most expensive series. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- It sure as hell implies it and that's what I take it to say, as would the "common man" I suspect. I say the hook is fine.. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- This seems like a ridiculous objection. When you report that something has set a new record and surpassed another thing, that other thing is presumed to be the prior record holder.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- "At $6 million, Cybergeddon is the most expensive Web series of all time, topping the roughly $2 million spent on Tom Hanks’ Electric City." essentially states that Electric City was the prior record holder.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please point me to the sentence where this is specifically stated. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it does. It specifically states that. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- This nom has been sitting here since August. Once again it is being held up by an objection over precise language that no one else seems to care about (given the lack of comments since). DYK is supposed to be a light and easy way for editors to get a little notice on new articles. We have clearly lost the plot, and I think Tony deserves an apology. I hope mine will suffice. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Given the amount of flak Cwmhiraeth has taken over issues of precision, I entirely understand that they want to be absolutely certain in this case. @Maury Markowitz and TonyTheTiger: it seems to me there is an easy fix here: simply use the more basic fact from the same source, that it was the most expensive web series when it was created. Must we get hung up on the 3 times as much? Vanamonde (talk) 07:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'm perfectly happy with that, Tony? Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the 2012 web series Cybergeddon was the most expensive web series in history at the time it was created?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)