Template:Did you know nominations/Cranfield experiments

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Cranfield experiments

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that debate over the Cranfield experiments in information retrieval went "well beyond the boundaries of civility"? Source: quote directly attributed in Critisms section, from Robertson page 4
  • ALT1:... that the Cranfield experiments in information retrieval suggested queries should be made in natural language? Source: Robertson page 3

• Reviewed: Reema Juffali

5x expanded by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 15:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC).

Review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The first hook about civility is best and might be even better if the parallels with Wikipedia were clearer, such as our disputes about categories. The article could use some examples to make the different indexing schemes clearer but that's not a significant obstacle to DYK. Andrew🐉(talk) 00:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)