Template:Did you know nominations/Constitution of Wisconsin

 The following is an archived discussion of Constitution of Wisconsin's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC).

Constitution of Wisconsin

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the original copy of the Constitution of Wisconsin is missing?

Created/expanded by Manny Quinn (talk) at 10:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC).

• Sorry, although the article is in nice shape, the prose text has not been 5x expanded in the past 5 days or so. Its prose size is currently 9921B, the last version on 28 November 2012 was 8319B, so it is a long way short. Please see WP:DYK for eligibility criteria. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)