Template:Did you know nominations/Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Fung

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 00:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Fung edit

(

)

... that in Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Fung, the defendant's "red flag knowledge" caused the court to determine that the defendant was ineligible for DMCA safe harbor provisions?

Comment "Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. V. Fung". Google Inc. Retrieved 1 October 2013.

Created by Ashwin.d.chandak (talk). Nominated by Riyazdf (talk) at 01:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC).

Heavily unreferenced. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Note: I have just notified the nominator's talk page, which hadn't yet been done. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification -- I've edited the lead section of the article to include the DYK (it checks out from the reference of the court case), and added references to the relevant cases after paragraphs. Riyazdf (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Significant improvement in referencing, although many are bare URLs, which are not allowed for DYKs. I've added some "citation needed" templates; these need inline sources as well. Once this is taken care of, I can call for a full review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

References have been properly formatted, and all citations have been given. Riyazdf (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Full review needed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

This article is now ready for DYK. It is new enough and long enough and sufficiently and appropriately referenced. The hook fact is well cited. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)