Template:Did you know nominations/Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory edit

Created/expanded by Michael Crowe (talk). Nominated by Croweml11 (talk) at 00:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Article is fully supported by inline citations. No images so no need to check that. Hook is properly formatted.
  • Some WP:NPOV and related tags have been inserted into the article, and they need cleaning up. at times, this reads like an essay. As an essay, it might not be that bad. It just isn't written in English Wikipedia style. (Review WP:LEAD for some idea on how the introduction should be written.) These problems exist outside the parts tagged. --LauraHale (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Once the tags have been addressed and other NPOV, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH issues have been resolved, rest of review will be completed. --LauraHale (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)