Template:Did you know nominations/Chic Chocolate

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Age

Chic Chocolate edit



Created/expanded by The Discoverer (talk), Soulparadox (talk). Nominated by The Discoverer (talk) at 08:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

The dating of the DYK nom with the article is a problem: the DYK was added June 30, for June 27, but the article was new on June 19th, and the expansion that did happen on the 27th doesn't appear to meet the 5x requirement. There may be some IAR here consider how close the dating is that I leave for comment, but this needs to be pointed out. Other aspects of the hook appear fine (might I suggest this "Times of India" article as a better source for it?)



Sorry, I was confused about the date. Can that be solved? Can I invoke IAR? :)
I've added the ToI article you pointed out to as a reference for the nickname in the main article. Is this what you were suggesting, Masem? The Discoverer (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Still no. The article has major problems. If you're going to nominate late, the article needs to be ready to go and this article requires extensive work to bring citations up to snuff. I will add fact tags so you can see where and help you realise what sort of citing you need going forward for future noms. --LauraHale (talk) 20:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)