- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cherax pulcher edit
.jpg)
- ... that the crayfish Cherax pulcher (pictured) was popular in aquariums worldwide before even being recognized as a new species?
- Reviewed: Cyanea nozaki
.jpg)
- Comment: I can't decide between these two pictures.
Also, if the hook is run without an image, ALT1 would be better.
- Comment: I can't decide between these two pictures.
Created by G S Palmer (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 28 June 2015 (UTC).
- Comment: I think the bottom picture (subject facing left, towards the text) is better: it strengthens the visual connection. Also, I think that "crayfish" should be stated regardless of image presence, in order to give a bit more context before clicking (I have no opinion as to weather crayfish should be linked or not). This is not a DYK review. --Animalparty-- (talk) 07:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
This 1500+ character article was created and nominated on the same day, so it meets those requirements. And I couldn't find any major issues with it. I think the hook is more interesting than the average. It is under 200 charterers and is cited under reference #2. Both images are rightfully uploaded on commons, so they're good. Finally, QPQ verified.
And I also agree with the comment above, but I think crayfish should be linked, it is a specific type of animal and many readers might not know exactly what it is. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2015 (UTC)