Template:Did you know nominations/Charles M. O'Brien

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Charles M. O'Brien edit

5x expanded by Connormah (talk). Self nominated at 04:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Article has been expanded 5x in past 5 days. It is over 1,500 characters, contains appropriate citations, does not contain plagiarism or close paraphrasing, and deals with the subject in a neutral manner. Both hooks are properly formatted, short enough, neutral, and do not put undue emphasis on a negative aspect of a living individual, however Hook 2 is not immediately followed by an inline citation to a reliable source. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Thanks for this. Like I said, hook 1 should be good to go then! – Connormah (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)