- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Changzhou comb edit
- ... that the handpainted Changzhou comb was a desired object among Chinese royalty during the Southern and Northern Dynasties over 1500 years ago?
- Comment: Student and aricle is part of WP:WikiProject China/NNU Class Project
Created/expanded by NNU-10-24100134 (talk). Nominated by L.tak (talk) at 12:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) |
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) | — SMUconlaw (talk) |
- The information in the hook is not properly referenced. Footnote 1 contains the website http://www.chinaich.com.cn, but this is just the home page of the website and there is no link on this page to any web page containing information about Changzhou combs.
- Article is only 1,457 characters long, but it just needs to be expanded slightly to reach 1,500 characters. I think the article could better describe the combs. The article tells me they are hand-painted, but it is not clear to me how the hand-painting makes them highly prized. For example, what sort of designs are painted on the combs, and what type of paint is used? Also, the difference between a wooden comb (梳) and a bi (篦) is not clear to me.
- Most of the citations are only bare URLs. Full information about the web pages should be provided. Archive URLs should also be added to avoid link rot.
- Some freely licensed photographs would improve the article greatly (though this is not required for the purpose of DYK).
- — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- thanks for the evaluation. I have filled out the refs now (including the first one, alghough it takes long to load) and asked the original author to add the rest. I'll keep an eye on it and expect all issues to be addressed withing 48 hours (but my chinese is not good enough to do it myself)! L.tak (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)