Template:Did you know nominations/Cebongan Prison raid

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Cebongan Prison raid's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 17:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC).

Cebongan Prison raid

edit

Created by Khazar2 (talk), Crisco 1492 (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 12:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Personally, I prefer the second hook, though I note while the article states it was "disputed" by the DM, the hook seems to imply that he refused to declare it as a human rights violation. Could this be clarified? Thanks! :) Sonoma's bridge (talk) 13:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the quick review! Yes, he did flatly state that it was not a violation: "This is not human rights violation, I want to be firm on this ... It is not a genocide incident ... It was a spontaneous action from military members. There was no systemic order from their superiors on this crime." The article uses "disputed" in the sense of "disagreed". Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the response – this should be good to go! Sonoma's bridge (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)