Template:Did you know nominations/Cathedral Range State Park

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 07:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Cathedral Range State Park edit

Cathedral Range Northern Section

5x expanded by Jessarah (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 05:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC).

  • Expanded at least 5x within time frame and hence long enough, within policy. The hook is good, interesting and cited. Picture license fine. Missing a QPQ, though (I think the QPQ rule was changed recently? Now it says all nominators must make a QPQ.). Otherwise fine, good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I must have been very tired yesterday - QPQ is done. GTG, offline sources AGF. Yakikaki (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Actually no, Leadbetter's possum is "suspected to occur" in the park but has not been seen there. How about this alternative hook -
  • ALT1 ... that native animals in the Cathedral Range State Park (northern section pictured) are threatened by introduced predators such as foxes, feral dogs and feral cats? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Works for me - @Yakikaki:, you ok with that one? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that's fine for me. Thank you Cwmhiraeth for being more attentive than myself. Should be good to go now, then. Yakikaki (talk) 06:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)