Template:Did you know nominations/Buxton Crescent

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Buxton Crescent edit

(

)

... that, though it owes much in design to the Royal Crescent in Bath, Buxton Crescent (pictured) is "more richly decorated and altogether more complex"?

ALT1:... that Buxton Crescent (pictured) has been empty and unused since 1992?

Created/expanded by Hallucegenia (talk). Self nom at 12:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format	Citation	Neutrality	Interest
Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul

Article review
Length	Newness	Adequate citations	Formatted citations	Reliable sources	Neutrality	Plagiarism
Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul	Obsidi♠n Soul

Some very minor fixes, but everything checks out. All sources are online and accessible. I prefer the alt hook (though I can not say why, heh).-- Obsidi♠n Soul 10:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)