Template:Did you know nominations/Burnt Bridge Creek

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Burnt Bridge Creek edit

(

)

... that although Burnt Bridge Creek does not meet Washington Dept. of Ecology standards for fecal bacteria, temperature, pH, and oxygen levels, the lowermost part of the creek supports Coho salmon?

Reviewed: Lepiota nirupama

Created by Finetooth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 12:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Statement checks out. Created on 1/20/2013, article barely qualifies (1,683 characters readable prose size) according to DYK check. Bouchecl (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)