Template:Did you know nominations/British Telecommunications Plc. v. Prodigy
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
British Telecommunications Plc. v. Prodigy edit
- ... that a U.S. District Court limited patent protection against Internet service providers' use of hyperlinks?
Created/expanded by Yjkim1021 (talk). Nominated by Djosephkennedy (talk) at 16:19, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
• Note: this nomination had no user links or valid credits. I added some after a very quick glance at the article history, but more credits may be due. Please check. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 18:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Referencing needs to be touched up before a further review can take place. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)- no action on referencing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
