Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Bristol and Bath Science Park

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  02:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Bristol and Bath Science Park

edit
(
)

5x expanded by Worm That Turned (talk) and Staceydolxx (talk). Nominated by Worm That Turned (talk) at 10:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • ✓ This article has been expanded from 191 chars to 2188 chars since 19:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC), a 11.46-fold expansion
    • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2188 characters
    • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (15.3% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • The sources are entirely from the BBC – while this is generally a good source it is not ideal for an article to be entirely sourced to one news outlet as articles should be based on multiple independent sources, can other sources be introduced?
The last section is worded a bit closely to the source, and "was intended to draw hi-tech firms to the South West, giving them a space to bring laboratory ideas to market" is a little close too. Perhaps introducing different information from other sources would help with this. 5x expansion and length are fine, the hook (which I trimmed slightly to make it catchier) is suitably cited. QPQ was done by User:Staceydolxx but as they have not actually edited this article I'm not sure this is sufficient to gain a credit. January (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello January, thanks for doing this review for us. I live with Worm That Turned and we collaborate on articles (usually I research while he writes) so although I hadn't edited it Worm has given me credit for the research. I have now edited the article to fix the issues you raised. Can you now please have another look? Thanks ツStacey (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
The sentence "was intended to draw hi-tech firms …" hasn't been addressed. Also re the addition about the solar chandelier, should it sit in the green energy section – is it an energy-saving initiative or just an artwork? January (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry its taken a few days to get back to this, January. I didn't think that sentence you pointed out was too close to the source but I have amended it anyway; I hope you find my changes okay? The chandelier is solar powered (that was the key part to the design) so I feel it fits best there. It can be moved if you think it would be better elsewhere? ツStacey (talk) 09:37, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
The chandelier is not a major issue so I won't delay this any further. Good to go. January (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Bristol_and_Bath_Science_Park&oldid=880610561"