Template:Did you know nominations/Bring Him Back Home (Nelson Mandela)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bring Him Back Home (Nelson Mandela)
edit- ... that the lyrics of the 1987 Hugh Masekela song "Bring Him Back Home (Nelson Mandela)" demand the release of Black South African leader Nelson Mandela from prison?
- ALT1: ... that the 1987 Hugh Masekela song "Bring Him Back Home (Nelson Mandela)" became the unofficial anthem of the anti-apartheid movement?
Created by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self nominated at 10:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC).
- Working on Ryan Peake for my QPQ. Will post when done.
Article is new enough and with 2443 characters (411 words) "readable prose size" just barely long enough. Sources check out! Once the quid pro quo review is completed the article is good to go. MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- MisterBee1966, thanks for the review. I just posted a review for Ryan Peake. I forget how this works, though; should this wait until that process is completed? Also FYI I just added a sentence to this article. Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
good to go now MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- @MisterBee1966: did you check the sources for close paraphrasing? Also, the paragraph under Music has no citations at all. Yoninah (talk) 02:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yoninah, thanks for your attention. I cannot of course check for close paraphrasing issue myself, although I have tried to avoid it. The source issue is easily fixed, however; I merely forgot to duplicate the source, which is one I have used in several places through the article. I have now fixed this. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Personally I feel comfortable with the state of the article. MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
We are encouraging reviewers to be more explicit in their reviews so that prep builders and queue promoters don't have to do the work over again. I reviewed the sources and did not see close paraphrasing. All cites are in place. Both hooks are verified and cited inline, so a green tick is in order. Yoninah (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
