Template:Did you know nominations/Borderlands: The Handsome Collection

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Borderlands: The Handsome Collection

edit

Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self nominated at 16:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Fully cited. QPQ done. Hook cited inline and verified. gtg Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Who needs remote-controlled claptrap? We have plenty of directly controlled claptrap right here at DYK. EEng (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Why are you pricing it at $400 when the source says $399? Yoninah (talk) 23:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • But you've only provided one source for the DYK hook fact, and that says $399. Do you want to add other cites to that sentence? Yoninah (talk) 11:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Even in an article it would be OK to round $399 to $400 as excess precision. In a hook it's even more sensible to do that, though in this case I don't think it matters much either way. EEng (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • This has been stuck in limbo for four weeks. Here's the revised hook; the sources mostly agree on the $399 price, and the hook citation has that amount, so I've used it in the article. (There's no good reason not to give its actual price.) Which leaves us with a new, slightly different version of the original hook:
  • Thank you, @BlueMoonset: I'm happy with that hook, and it is verified and cited inline. Some additional material added by User:ViperSnake151 since the last review also checks out and has no close paraphrasing. The article is written neutrally and has no close paraphrasing. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)