- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Binod Chaudhary edit
.jpg)
Binod Chaudhary
- ... that Binod Chaudhary (pictured) is the first Nepalese to be listed on Forbes' billionaire list? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that Binod Chaudhary (pictured) is the first billionaire of Nepal? Source: "[2]
5x expanded by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 20:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC).
Reviewed: Arab Serai
According to the DYK tool, the expansion done to the article has not reached 5x. This will still require some work before it can be approved for DYK. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: expansion has been completed. [3] before expansion it had 391 words now it contains 1980. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: the DYKcheck tool reports that there were 2441 prose characters prior to expansion, 12283 afterward. Since a 5x expansion would be to 12205, it has made it. Previous incarnations of the article did go higher than 2441 (I found one pretty close to 4000), which is why DYKcheck says the 5x expansion dates back to 2013, but those were far enough in the past that they aren't relevant now for the current expansion—the article had been stable at 2441 since March. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. The subject is outside my expertise so I will be leaving the review to another editor. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
This article is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough, as far as I can tell (2441B --> 12 kb). The image is appropriately licensed, the hook facts are cited inline and either could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. I have done some copyediting. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
