- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 19:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bear Witness
- ... that reviewers of Bear Witness's songs said that "The songs were richer than the first wave of Madonna's hits"? Source: O'Donnell, John; Creswell, Toby; Mathieson, Craig (October 2010). 100 Best Australian Albums. Prahran, Vic: Hardie Grant Books. pp. 238–239. ISBN 978-1-74066-955-9.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Delaware Straight-Out Truth Teller
- Comment: Finding hooks for this was really hard so if you have any hooks for this please share.
Improved to Good Article status by Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) and Dan arndt (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 21:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC).
- ALT1: ... that Bear Witness's second single "Holy Word" (July 1986) has lead vocals by Zan Abeyratne instead of regular lead vocalist Kate Ceberano, who was unavailable when its demo sessions were recorded? Source: Adams, Cameron (13 April 2018). "The History of I'm Talking". The Herald Sun.
Is MusicBrainz a reliable source? Seems like it is user-edited. Some of the "Track listing" (should it be "Track listings"?) subsections have no sources at all. The headings should also be normalized to not start with a capital letter after the year. Other than that, the article looks good. Noting here that I recommend using ALT0 over ALT1 as ALT1 is more about a song than the album. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 18:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Shaidar cuebiyar: Please respond to IceWelder's review. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- IceWelder. Thanks for your comments. I can accept your preference for ALT0. Go for it.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Shaidar cuebiyar: You still haven't confirmed whether or not MusicBrainz is a reliable source. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I was under the impression that it was a database, but I see there is a case for it being user-generated source, too. Sorry, about that. I'll see if I can find an alternative source.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
