Template:Did you know nominations/Bang Bang (Green Day song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Bang Bang (Green Day song)

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Yash! (talk). Self-nominated at 20:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC).

  • GA status reached, nominated within 5 days of it being promoted, QPQ provided, source/hook check out, copyvio doesn't seem to be a concern (with the only parts being triggered being the quotes, it would appear), looks good to go. Zappa24Mati 22:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this. The DYK criteria check out, but I'm wondering about that cite (footnote 17) at the end of the paragraph under "Music video". This source doesn't include any of the information in the second half of the paragraph. Yoninah (talk) 19:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Yoninah, the second​ half is a "Plot"-like description of the video and I could use the YouTube link of the official video there (I didn't because it is already linked in the "External links". I can add it as a citation if you suggest. I have removed the part of Ukrainian actress (as it is a very minor and unimportant point). The footnote provides a brief description of the video with a link to the official video but I see how it's not very helpful. Let me know if I need to make any changes. Regards, — Yash talk stalk 08:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Yash!: thanks for the explanation. I went ahead and removed the cite from the end of the paragraph; the paragraph already has some other (verified) cites, so there's no problem DYK-wise. Restoring tick per ZappaOMati's review. Yoninah (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)