The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Bête

edit
The suit of Spades in Bête follows the unusual ranking used in Écarté
The suit of Spades in Bête follows the unusual ranking used in Écarté
  • ... that the historical French pastime of la Bête, originally called l'Homme, was the first card game to use the concept of bidding?
    Source: "The adoption of bidding into Triomphe occurred during the 17th century to produce a game called at first l'Homme ("Man") and subsequently la Bête (German Labet, Dutch LaBate, English Beast). The former title shows its origin to lie with the 16th-century Spanish game of Hombre (English and French Ombre)." ("Five-Trick Trump Games" at www.parlettgames.uk.)
    • ALT1:... that the historical French card game of la Bête has its origins in 16th-century Spanish Ombre and was created by introducing the concept of bidding into Triomphe?
      Source: as above

Created by Bermicourt (talk). Self-nominated at 06:26, 8 May 2019 (UTC).

  • Comment. I've rewritten the hook to align better with Parlett's actual description. Bermicourt (talk) 19:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough, the article is neutral and the image is properly licensed. However, the hook states that the game has its origin in Ombre while the article only states that it may have done so. Another problem is that the sentence "The adoption of bidding into Triomphe occurred during the 17th century to produce a game called at first l'Homme ("Man") and subsequently la Bête (German Labet, Dutch LaBate, English Beast)." appears to be identical to a sentence in this source. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Issues addressed. I've reworded that section to better reflect the sources, but also rewritten the sentence mentioned and cited it anyway. Bermicourt (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you. The ALT1 hook facts are now cited inline, and this nomination is good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)