- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Australian nationality law
- ... that even though Australian citizens are no longer British subjects, they can still vote in elections and stand for parliament in the United Kingdom? Redefinition of British subject in UK law and continued Australian eligibility for voting and parliament supported in Bloom 2011 pp. 640, 654. British subject status also abolished in Australian law, supported by Stephen 2000 p. 333.
Improved to Good Article status by Horserice (talk). Self-nominated at 19:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
Overall:
The Wikipedia Library access I have to Taylor & Francis unfortunately isn't enough to get me by the paywall, but AGF and everything here looks good. Definitely an interesting hook. Bolded term is a redirect to the article. No QPQ needed. Plagiarism/neutrality assumed to have been covered during GAN.
{{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library access I have to Taylor & Francis unfortunately isn't enough to get me by the paywall, but AGF and everything here looks good. Definitely an interesting hook. Bolded term is a redirect to the article. No QPQ needed. Plagiarism/neutrality assumed to have been covered during GAN. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)