- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aubri Esters
- ... that Aubri Esters was among the winners of a hackathon focused on ways to reduce drug addiction and deaths? Source: https://www.wbur.org/news/2016/09/12/opiod-hackathon
- Reviewed:
Created by Elttaruuu (talk). Self-nominated at 06:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Aubri Esters; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- no
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
QPQ: 
Overall: 
@Elttaruuu: Thanks for contributing to DYK; your article needs some copy editing as the [earwig score] is exceeding the limit. RV (talk) 09:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the revision. It appears to be satisfactory to me, and I've marked it for review. RV (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I've had a look at the article. The date of birth is unreferenced, which is not acceptable for a bio. Close paraphrasing is mostly good now apart from one instance:
- Article: if she were to have died of an overdose, she would want the world to know it.
- Source: if she were to have died of an overdose, Esters would want the world to know it.
Once fixed, this is good to go. Schwede66 19:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I did fix both of these concerns. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elttaruuu (talk • contribs) 19:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging Schwede66 to check to see whether the issues have been adequately addressed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping, BlueMoonset – I failed to watchlist this article. No, the close paraphrasing wasn't adequately addressed, I'm afraid. All you did is rearrange some words and changed the tense. I've written it in my own words, though, hence it now passes. Schwede66 05:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
