- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Arlene Kelly (cricketer)
Created by Lugnuts (talk). Self-nominated at 17:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/Symbol_confirmed.svg/16px-Symbol_confirmed.svg.png)
Overall a great little article and read for my night. Article created on June 3, 2022, in time for the DYK nomination and is long enough with I believe 2,050 characters. The article is adequately sourced with reliable references, neutral on the character of Kelly, and only a 2% copyvio check having no plagiarism. The hook is cited and is catchy.
Nine people...yikes. That is very unfortunate for the nine players, but good on Kelly for getting her opportunity on the national team. A QPQ is done as per the requirements. The only feedback I can give regarding the article's content would be to eventually move the refs in the lead to the prose as is already stated, personal preference. In addition, the hook is formatted correctly, length appropriately, and positive. Altogether, the article is good to go!
Adog (Talk・Cont) 04:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)