Template:Did you know nominations/Antirrhinum filipes

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Antirrhinum filipes edit

5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC).

  • Starting review.--Kevmin § 19:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Having trouble? SL93 (talk) 07:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  • No, just real life taking a bit more time that typical. It will happen, be patient--Kevmin § 16:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  • First check, article expansion is new enough and long enough. The second paragraph of he description is sourced, but with all three sources tagged at the end it makes it unclear what information was from what source.--Kevmin § 17:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  • It should be simpler now. SL93 (talk) 18:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Article expansion new enough and long enough. Hook cited and off line sourcing taken AGF. Article cited fully and no copyvio or policy issues identified in the prose. Looks good to go.--Kevmin § 13:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)