- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Adam Kingsmill
Created by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
@HickoryOughtShirt?4 Good article! Hooks are interesting and the article is new and long enough. Just waiting on a QPQ and then i'll approve it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke I have started the QPQ process but the user isn't responding to me. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- @HickoryOughtShirt?4: Ok but question. Do ongoing reviews count as QPQs?. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke I pinged BlueMoonset who is definitely more knowledgable on this topic than I am. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- The QPQ has to be a full review covering all the DYK criteria, from length and timeliness to policy issues such as neutrality and copyvio to the hook. HickoryOughtShirt?4, you don't need to wait for the nominator to respond to your review, but you do need to fully finish the QPQ review before Onegreatjoke can approve this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset and Onegreatjoke:, the QPQ has been satisfied. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @HickoryOughtShirt?4:
Alright, approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)