Template:Did you know nominations/2002 Sure For Men Rockingham 500

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  04:30, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

2002 Sure For Men Rockingham 500 edit

5x expanded by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This article has been expanded from 284 chars to 15629 chars since 11:48, 08 May 2016 (UTC), a 55.03-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 15629 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 21.9% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 101 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 155 characters
    • The hook ALT2 is an appropriate length at 161 characters
    • MWright96 has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Zwölf Stücke, Op. 80 was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • DYK checklist template
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Invalid status "Y" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"