Talk:Zygophyllaceae

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Peter coxhead in topic Genera treated as synonyms by PoWO

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zygophyllaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Genera treated as synonyms by PoWO edit

The genera Fagonia and Tetraena are listed here, and there are articles, but neither are accepted by Plants of the World Online, being treated as synonyms of Zygophyllum. Why and whether this is justified, I don't know. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply