Talk:Zumbox

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

New pages patrol

edit

I've come across this article Zumbox today as part of the above project. It seems in good shape, but it really needs WP:RS, not just to the website of its subject. There's no reason why it shouldn't meet WP:N with these and a little expansion. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. HJ Mitchell (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

There's some funny stuff going on here

edit

Looks like some folks are editing this page in a non-factual way. Adding subjective commentary about this business. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.204.123 (talk) 07:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zumbox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply