Talk:Zoboomafoo

New Episodes

New episodes are being produced: pbskids.org/zoboo/. ςפקιДИτς ☺ ☻ 05:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

This is false; the page shows that these are episodes from the second season that have been produced long ago.ohyeh 5:32pm July 18th, 2006

Zoboomafooism

That religion thing...hilarious. KinseyLOL 08:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

It's been removed with a message "Removed irrelevant content". Why? Sounds relevant to me. --Liface 20:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

I told my friends about Zaboomafoism and they couldn't believe how stupid it was. We literaly laughed for days about it. It has no relevence to this article. Zoboomafoo is a fine program that doesn't need this negative publicity.--Kiwiboy1221 21:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Re Zoboomafooism

For the last time please don't put anything about zaboomafoosim on this page ever again. It's not funny. Last year I deleted the paragraph and left a comment (I even used a sense of humor). I will block the next person who puts zoboomafooism back on this page. --Kiwiboy1221 03:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Photo of Zoboo?

Are we able to post a photo of zoboo? The article looks quite naked without an illustration or two. I'm sure someone can dig up a couple of photos under the "free use" provisions, since this is for educational purposes. The claymation segments would benefit from a photo and description for sure. --Dulcimerist 17:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Songs from the Show?

Could more reference be made to the songs they do on the show? "Who Could It Be" is mentioned briefly, but not the one where the Kratt brothers come out of the closet to go on a trip. --Dulcimerist 17:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Expansion

Working on it. Any assistance would be welcomed. Gladys j cortez (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

A note on categories

This page belongs to the category Category:Fictional non-human primates. The category Category:Fictional primates does not and will not exist, so please do not add it to the page. The reason is that the former includes all primates except humans, while the latter would include humans as well. To keep the category tree simple and since most people are just looking for non-human primates (NHPs), only Category:Fictional non-human primates will be used. – VisionHolder « talk » 12:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Contributicons

The list at the bottom referred to "viewer contributicons" as being a source of funding. I have changed it to "viewer contributions" in case it was just a misspelling. If "contributicon" is the appropriate word for some reason, an explanation is called for. 69.171.145.171 (talk) 08:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Image?

I found the perfect photo for this page, but im unable to upload it for some odd reason. Little help here?? Thanks Monkeys 9711 (talk) 20:31, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Multiple issues (November 2014)

Only the Awards and Production notes sections have citations. The contributions by User:75.10.139.135 (revision 620706976, edit summary: "It had the funding credits") and subsequent reinstatement by User:Meatsgains (revision 625959362, summary: "Reverted to revision 625935686 by Websurfer246: User gave no reason for removing content. content he provided was unsourced. (TW)") are unsourced and seem like original research, particularly given how geography-specific some sponsors are. Is the Funding section even necessary? I have never seen anything like that for this kind of article, and I don't think it adds to the overall topic of the article. --ChrstphrChvz (talk • contribs) 06:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

New images

Can you guys please add more images of Zoboomafoo? -- 70.190.228.32 (talk) 08:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Healthex

I found a video on Youtube from 1999 that shows Healthtex sponsoring the show. Can I put it as funding the show?(71.212.34.158 (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC))

American-Canadian production

The show was an American-Canadian co-production: the American network PBS, the Canadian company Cinar, and the Kratt brothers' Earth Creatures Company. See the press release on Bloomberg and the PBS press release. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 23:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Major quality issues

This article has an excessive amount of unnecessary details, and most of it is completely unsourced. I'm going to work on removing some of the nonsense, but the article may end up needing a rewrite.

I'm going to add a cleanup tag, feel free to remove it if not neccessary. mir ^:3 21:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Should've preserved some of the information, the rewrite tag now doesn't make sense since everything has been removed. Removing the original information (mostly accurate but a little messy) doesn't change anything. Xenoriole (talk) 19:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC)