Talk:Ziauddin Sardar

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

this looks like its an advert for him. is he still alive? did he write this himself?

Yes apparently it's taken verbatim from his official web site. . Nitpyck (talk)

This sentence in the Islamic reform section: "Such a point of view is not shared by all religious believers, and there are many who would say that sacred texts such as The Qur'an need to be read and interpreted more literally -- and that this is a sign of their timelessness". Is it really necessary to repeat the opposing argument? We're talking about things he wrote in a book, it's his opinion and doesn't need to be countered with "but" this and "however" that all the time. Shax (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ziauddin Sardar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply