Talk:Zhonghua minzu
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Wengier in topic Qing/Manchu view of the subject changes over time...
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zhonghua minzu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 120 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Move the article to "Chinese nation"
editQing/Manchu view of the subject changes over time...
editit might be interesting to discuss the evolution of national identity, including how "Manchu" itself included specify group of Han, so their "Zhonghua Minzu" maybe a rehash of their own evolution of the Manchu identity... as Russian and Korean population grew along the frontier, the need for population to maintain control of their frontier region and stop foreign settlement probably influence their shift in view. 2406:3003:2006:C2A4:8CAD:B952:92CE:C327 (talk) 13:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- This appears to be talking about a different subject, instead of the subject of this article. I don't think the Qing ever officially adopted the concept "Zhonghua minzu" before its downfall, although the immediate roots of the concept did lie in the Qing dynasty, and Qing considered Manchu and Han all as "Chinese subjects" since the 17th century, as shown in official documents and treaties from that time, even though they have maintained Manchu identity at that time. As pointed out by scholars, the Manchu rulers assigned new meaning to the word 'China' while becoming Chinese. --Wengier (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)